"In actuality, there's probably no Shakespeare that Woman's Will wouldn't do well...Woman's Will is no-nonsense theatre brimming with intelligence and passion." - Chad Jones,
Oakland Tribune

Your souls can still be saved!

(Left to right) Lisa Jenai Hernandez and Jenny Debevec.
A Christmas comedy from Brecht and Weill? Yup!
A heartwarming tale of softhearted gangsters, a plucky Salvation Army dame, missing money and of course, a Happy End - that teaches the musical lesson that "robbing a bank's no crime compared to owning one!"
November 4 - December 4
Come early to eat, drink and be merry!
Fridays at 8pm
Original Joe's
144 Taylor Street (near Powell Street BART)
San Francisco
Thursday & Saturdays at 7pm
Sundays at 2pm
Luka's Taproom
2221 Broadway at Grand (near 19th Street BART)
Oakland
RESERVATIONS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED
Tickets: $15-$25
(suggested donation; no one turned away for lack of funds)
Buy Tickets
510.420.0813

Both sites are wheelchair accessible
Happy End had a chaotic beginning. Written in a rush to capitalize on the recent success of Threepenny Opera, the original production flopped terribly, though perhaps less due to any faults in the play and more because Helene Weigel (Brecht’s wife, who was playing “The Fly”) took time out in the third act to ad lib an attack on the audience’s bourgeois leanings. Whatever the reason, Brecht did not even put his name on the first published edition of the script. In its place was that of Elisabeth Hauptmann, his secretary, lover, and co-writer on many of his early plays, including the aforementioned Threepenny Opera. So in a way, this is Woman’s Will’s first production written by a woman. By contrast, “Dorothy Lane,” the woman whose name remains above the title line and on whose novel the piece supposedly was based, does not even exist.
Despite its inauspicious origins, Happy End is an accessible introduction to a playwright unfairly judged to be ponderous and difficult. Light on politics, the play nonetheless gives an audience a representative taste of Brecht’s anti-establishment attitude—in Happy End, “robbing a bank’s no crime compared to owning one,” and the gangs and Salvation (and other) armies all serve the same underclass that is desperately trying to survive in a country run by robber barons. Other characteristic Brechtian motifs are here in spades as well—his sharp and wicked sense of humor, his snappy dialogue (so wonderfully adapted by Michael Feingold), his love of all things American, and his distinct performance style, most notably evidenced in the two terms gestus and alienation effect.
Gestus was Brecht’s name for a strong, short-hand approach to physicality that illuminates a character’s social status, purpose in the play and attitude towards life to an audience from their first glance—but it was not much different from the acting style of American film of the time. To understand the idea of gestus, think of Humphrey Bogart’s characters or those of Peter Lorre (who originated the role of Dr. Nakamura); think of Keystone Kops and cartoon characters. No wonder that Brecht so enjoyed creating his own version of these famous American film icons.
The much misconstrued alienation effect (derived from a Russian term, priem ostranneniye, to make foreign or strange) also shows up in straightforward ways. A sweet Salvation Army lass singing from the point of view of debauched sailors, gangsters doing a soft shoe dance, and an improbably silly happy ending, all make a distinction between the actors and their characters, between reality and make-believe. Alienation is not a hostile distancing but an invitation to look at the everyday from a new point of view and to examine your own reactions and beliefs. Modern audiences of Happy End get an additional jolt as they watch a white person play a painfully stereotypical “Oriental” character—untroubling casting when Brecht wrote the play, but a prime opportunity for alienation now. And, as always, Woman’s Will employs an additional alienation technique—casting women in the roles of men.
And then there is Kurt Weill’s delicious and haunting music. The perfect match for Brecht’s words, Weill’s songs embody and enliven the alienation effect by constructing contradictions between the tone of the tune and the words of the singer and through the application of liberal doses of dissonance and melodic surprise. Happy End features some of this brilliant and influential composer’s most lovely and complex compositions, and some of his toe-tappingest.
For this production, Woman’s Will’s emphasis, as always, is on bringing the text to life in ways that reflect both the original intent and the reality of our own time and place. In this spirit, we have made one adjustment—the piece was originally set in 1919, but we have updated it to 1939 to more accurately reflect modern audiences’ images of American movie gangsters; and to highlight the tension between the end of a devastating Depression and the onset of war that had just happened in Germany and was moments away in America. This time in Germany meant the end of runaway inflation but also the end of a unique period of freedom for artists, homosexuals and non-Christians; indeed, it meant mechanized death on a broader scale than the world had ever seen. This period in America in some ways also mirrors our country today, as Americans fight our own economic, cultural and literal wars in the 21st century. Woman’s Will’s Happy End is set in the moment before our innocence was shattered, but experienced by those whose innocence is, for the moment, gone. That, perhaps, is the ultimate alienation.
-Erin Merritt
Caption: (Left to right) Lisa Jenai Hernandez and Jenny Debevec.
Photographer: Elizabeth Allen
Site: Wilde Oscar's
This activity is funded in part by the California Arts Council, a state agency, and the National Endowment for the Arts, a federal agency.
|
|
|
|